Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) MAXINE BLOCKER-BURNETTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1185 (PLF) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is
hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary
judgment [6], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claim for unliquidated
damages under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act will be dismissed and the
individually named defendants, Tori Fernandez-Whitney and Carolos Cano, will also be
dismissed. The rest of plaintiff’s claims may proceed; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to maintain her claim for age
discrimination [11] is DENIED as moot; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint
report with the Court regarding how they wish to proceed in this matter by September 13, 2010.
/s/________________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: August 13, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia (Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.