Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia
This text of Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia (Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) MAXINE BLOCKER-BURNETTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1185 (PLF) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is
hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary
judgment [6], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claim for unliquidated
damages under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act will be dismissed and the
individually named defendants, Tori Fernandez-Whitney and Carolos Cano, will also be
dismissed. The rest of plaintiff’s claims may proceed; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to maintain her claim for age
discrimination [11] is DENIED as moot; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint
report with the Court regarding how they wish to proceed in this matter by September 13, 2010.
/s/________________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: August 13, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blocker-burnette-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2010.