Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 13, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1185
StatusPublished

This text of Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia (Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) MAXINE BLOCKER-BURNETTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1185 (PLF) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary

judgment [6], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claim for unliquidated

damages under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act will be dismissed and the

individually named defendants, Tori Fernandez-Whitney and Carolos Cano, will also be

dismissed. The rest of plaintiff’s claims may proceed; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to maintain her claim for age

discrimination [11] is DENIED as moot; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint

report with the Court regarding how they wish to proceed in this matter by September 13, 2010.

/s/________________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: August 13, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blocker-burnette-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2010.