Blitzer v. Blitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blitzer v. Blitzer

46 A.D.2d 858, 361 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 858 (Blitzer v. Blitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blitzer v. Blitzer, 46 A.D.2d 858, 361 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, entered on July 22, 1974, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding the proceeding for a plenary hearing on the issue of the amount of support of the child Diane, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record is devoid of any findings of facts deemed essential by the trial court for its determination (Family Ct. Act, § 165; CPLR 4213, [859]*859subd. [b]) and for ónr review. The record is completely barren of any proof regarding the needs of the child, the cost of her support or the means of the father. Pending the hearing on the remand, the father is to continue the payments of $20 per week directed by the appealed order. Concur — MeGivern, P. J., Markewich, Nunez and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court of the State of New York, Bronx County, entered on July 22, 1974, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding the proceeding for a plenary hearing on the issue of the amount of support of the child Diane, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record is devoid of any findings of facts deemed essential by the trial court for its determination (Family Ct. Act, § 165; CPLR 4213, [859]*859subd. [b]) and for ónr review. The record is completely barren of any proof regarding the needs of the child, the cost of her support or the means of the father. Pending the hearing on the remand, the father is to continue the payments of $20 per week directed by the appealed order. Concur — MeGivern, P. J., Markewich, Nunez and Macken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 858, 361 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blitzer-v-blitzer-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack