Blitzer v. Blitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blitzer v. Blitzer

51 A.D.2d 960, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 960 (Blitzer v. Blitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blitzer v. Blitzer, 51 A.D.2d 960, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, County of Bronx, entered March 13, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts to increase the support for the daughter, Diane, to $25 per week payable in advance on Monday of each week, effective as of the date of this order, without prejudice to an application to the Family Court with respect to arrears of alimony and support. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount awarded for support of Diane is insufficient to the extent indicated. The appeals from the orders entered April 5 and April 24, 1975, denying appellant’s applications for rescheduling of a plenary hearing, are dismissed as nonappealable without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Murphy, Silverman and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, County of Bronx, entered March 13, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts to increase the support for the daughter, Diane, to $25 per week payable in advance on Monday of each week, effective as of the date of this order, without prejudice to an application to the Family Court with respect to arrears of alimony and support. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount awarded for support of Diane is insufficient to the extent indicated. The appeals from the orders entered April 5 and April 24, 1975, denying appellant’s applications for rescheduling of a plenary hearing, are dismissed as nonappealable without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Murphy, Silverman and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 960, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blitzer-v-blitzer-nyappdiv-1976.