Blesso v. Blesso
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 357
Opinion
The proof of the plaintiff's residence in this case was insufficient. Since the proof may exist and since the case otherwise appears to be one in which a decree should be granted, I am returning the papers to the file. If the plaintiff desires to present his evidence again, he should be permitted to do so without prejudice. See Slade vs. Slade,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blesso v. Blesso, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 357 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 357 (Blesso v. Blesso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.