Blesso v. Blesso
4 Conn. Supp. 357, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 221
Opinion
The proof of the plaintiff’s residence in this case was insufficient. Since the proof may exist and since the case otherwise appears to be one in which a decree should be granted, I am returning the papers to the file. If the plaintiff desires to present his evidence again, he should be permitted to do so without prejudice. See Slade vs. Slade, 4 Connecticut Supplement, 242.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blesso v. Blesso, 4 Conn. Supp. 357, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 221 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).
4 Conn. Supp. 357 (Blesso v. Blesso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.