Blanks v. State

288 S.W. 452, 105 Tex. Crim. 341, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 13, 1926·No. No. 9528.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

It appears from the record that the trial was had before a special judge. The record is silent touching the appointment or selection of the special judge, or the reasons therefor, also with reference to the taking of the oath of office. See Smith v. State, 24 Tex. Crim. Rep. 290; Reed v. State, 55 Tex. Crim. Rep. 138; Salazar v. State, 276 S. W. 1105.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanks v. State, 288 S.W. 452, 105 Tex. Crim. 341, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535 (Tex. 1926).

288 S.W. 452 (Blanks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petitte v. State
21 S.W.2d 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Biggins v. State
3 S.W.2d 816 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)