Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Blanks v. State

Blanks v. State

288 S.W. 452, 105 Tex. Crim. 341, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 1926
DocketNo. 9528.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 288 S.W. 452 (Blanks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blanks v. State, 288 S.W. 452, 105 Tex. Crim. 341, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535 (Tex. 1926).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

It appears from the record that the trial was had before a special judge. The record is silent touching the appointment or selection of the special judge, or the reasons therefor, also with reference to the taking of the oath of office. See Smith v. State, 24 Tex. Crim. Rep. 290; Reed v. State, 55 Tex. Crim. Rep. 138; Salazar v. State, 276 S. W. 1105.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petitte v. State
21 S.W.2d 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Biggins v. State
3 S.W.2d 816 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 S.W. 452, 105 Tex. Crim. 341, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanks-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.