Blank v. State
This text of 106 S.W.2d 277 (Blank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The conviction is for the unlawful sale of malt liquor containing alcohol in excess of one-half of one per cent of volume; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.00 and confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.
The information is insufficient to charge an offense under the authority of Whitmire v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 742, holding that the information must allege that an election had been held in the • particular county which resulted in the prohibition of the act charged. The principle announced has been followed in many recent cases, among them being Kelly v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 998; Privitt v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 204; Hardin v. State, 101 S. W. (2d) 264; Pond v. State, 101 S. W. (2d) 247.
For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.W.2d 277, 132 Tex. Crim. 535, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blank-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.