Pond v. State

101 S.W.2d 247, 131 Tex. Crim. 559, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 34
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 1937·No. No. 18724·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale intoxicating liquor in dry area, punishment assessed being a fine of $100.00.

The indictment is fatally defective. It merely charged that appellant possessed whisky for the purpose of sale in Cherokee County, Texas, and that said county was “dry area.”

It has been held many times that such an averment is not sufficient to show that local option was in effect in the territory where the transaction is alleged to have occurred. See Whitmire v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 742; Schmidt v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 743; Coleman v. State, 97 S. W. (2d) 701; Privett v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 204; Clepper v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 207; Jones v. State, 98 S. W. (2d) 208.

Judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pond v. State, 101 S.W.2d 247, 131 Tex. Crim. 559, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 34 (Tex. 1937).

101 S.W.2d 247 (Pond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frost v. State
369 S.W.2d 357 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Blank v. State
106 S.W.2d 277 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)