Bland v. Hebner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BELLA BLAND, No. 3:23-cv-00448-JR
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
JEFFREY HEBNER, an individual, and DG LLC db Dream Girls Espresso, an Oregon Limited Liability Company,
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 6, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Default Judgment. F&R, ECF 26. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [29]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Default Judgment [26] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ______J_u_n_e_ _2_0_,_ 2_0__2_4________.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bland v. Hebner (Bland v. Hebner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.