Bland v. Hebner

CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon
DecidedMay 4, 2024
Docket3:23-cv-00448
StatusUnknown

This text of Bland v. Hebner (Bland v. Hebner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bland v. Hebner, (D. Or. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BELLA BLAND, No. 3:23-cv-00448-JR

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

JEFFREY HEBNER, an individual, and DG LLC db Dream Girls Espresso, an Oregon Limited Liability Company,

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on March 22, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [23] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________M_a__y_ 4_,_ 2_0__2_4________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bland v. Hebner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bland-v-hebner-ord-2024.