Blanchard v. Town of Kearny
This text of 379 A.2d 288 (Blanchard v. Town of Kearny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LARRY BLANCHARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOWN OF KEARNY AND JAMES HESLEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWN OF KEARNY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN BARNOWSKI, SR., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.
Mr. Robert A. Rusignola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rusignola & Pugliese, attorneys).
Mr. Charles A. Rooney, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Rooney, Peduto & Rooney, attorneys; Mr. Gustave A. Peduto, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the trial judge's reported opinion. 145 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 A.2d 288, 153 N.J. Super. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanchard-v-town-of-kearny-njsuperctappdiv-1977.