Blanchard v. Town of Kearny

379 A.2d 288, 153 N.J. Super. 158
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided October 19, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

153 N.J. Super. 158 (1977)
379 A.2d 288

LARRY BLANCHARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOWN OF KEARNY AND JAMES HESLEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWN OF KEARNY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN BARNOWSKI, SR., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 3, 1977.
Decided October 19, 1977.

Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.

Mr. Robert A. Rusignola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rusignola & Pugliese, attorneys).

Mr. Charles A. Rooney, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Rooney, Peduto & Rooney, attorneys; Mr. Gustave A. Peduto, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the trial judge's reported opinion. 145 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanchard v. Town of Kearny, 379 A.2d 288, 153 N.J. Super. 158 (N.J. Ct. App. 1977).

379 A.2d 288 (Blanchard v. Town of Kearny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tice v. Cramer
627 A.2d 1090 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Hooper v. City of Chula Vista
212 Cal. App. 3d 442 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)