Blakely v. State
881 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12739, 2004 WL 1920062
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 [692]*692So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blakely v. State, 881 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12739, 2004 WL 1920062 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
881 So. 2d 691 (Blakely v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)