Blakely v. State

864 So. 2d 1288, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1293, 2004 WL 234389
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3799
StatusPublished

This text of 864 So. 2d 1288 (Blakely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blakely v. State, 864 So. 2d 1288, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1293, 2004 WL 234389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of his amended rule 3.850 motion, in which he alleges that his counsel was ineffective for a variety of reasons. We affirm the trial court’s denial as to all of the appellant’s claims for postconviction relief, but reverse that part of the order that prohibits the appellant from filing further pro se filings, because the trial court failed to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to the allegations levied against him by the trial court. See State v. Spencer, 751 Solid 47 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 So. 2d 1288, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1293, 2004 WL 234389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakely-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.