Blake v. McMillen

33 Iowa 150
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 22, 1871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.

On a former appeal in this case, it was held that a presentment to one only of the two joint makers was not sufficient to charge the indorser, unless some legal [151]*151excuse be shown for the failure to make presentment to the other. Blake v. McMillen, 22 Iowa, 358. The agreed facts show that David Van Patter died before the maturity of the note; that Eliza Van Patter was his legal representative when the note became due and no excuse is shown for a failure to make presentment to her. Following the ruling on the former appeal the judgment is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. McMillen, 33 Iowa 150 (iowa 1871).

33 Iowa 150 (Blake v. McMillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Closz & Mickelson v. Miracle
103 Iowa 198 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Luning v. Wise
1 P. 495 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Graul v. Strutzel
6 N.W. 119 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)
Bank of Red Oak v. Orvis
40 Iowa 332 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)