Bank of Red Oak v. Orvis

40 Iowa 332
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 9, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 Iowa 332 (Bank of Red Oak v. Orvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Red Oak v. Orvis, 40 Iowa 332 (iowa 1875).

Opinion

Beck, J.

The notes in suit were executed by two joint makers to Fisher, who indorsed them to plaintiff. The action was brought against both makers and the indorser, and judgment rendered against all of them. No objection is made to the judgment by the makers, the indorser alone appealing.

I. The evidence before the court did not authorize the judgment against the indorsor. There was no evidence of 1. ratoMtsso-indOTse?™1 evidence. presentation and demand of payment upon one °*’ notes- The indorser cannot be charged thereon in the absence of such evidence and of proof of the notice required by law.

II. The evidence shows the presentation and demand of payment upon the other note made on one of the joint 2.__ joint makers, makers only. This is insufficient to charge the indorser on that instrument. Blake v. McMillen, 22 Iowa, 358; same case, 33 Iowa, 150. See Allen v. Harrah, 30 Iowa, 363, which is not inconsistent with the other cases cited, as the note involved therein was payable in Ohio.

The judspnent as to the appellant, Fisher, is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Closz & Mickelson v. Miracle
103 Iowa 198 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Graul v. Strutzel
6 N.W. 119 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Iowa 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-red-oak-v-orvis-iowa-1875.