Blake v. Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blake v. Blake

83 A.D.3d 1509, 921 N.Y.S.2d 614

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2011

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 1509 (Blake v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. Blake, 83 A.D.3d 1509, 921 N.Y.S.2d 614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from [1510]*1510an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered July 15, 2010 in a divorce action. The .order denied the quantum meruit application of defendant’s attorney for counsel fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Blake v Blake (83 AD3d 1509 [2011]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from [1510]*1510an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered July 15, 2010 in a divorce action. The .order denied the quantum meruit application of defendant’s attorney for counsel fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Blake v Blake (83 AD3d 1509 [2011]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 1509, 921 N.Y.S.2d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-blake-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack