Blake v. Blake

118 N.C. 575
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Clark, J.:

Under the devise in the will, which is-appended to the complaint, the property was left in trust to be “ divided when the youngest child should arrive at age.” That contingency not yet having happened, a division can not be ordered. Green v. Green, 86 N. C., 546. The complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Dismissed.. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Blake, 118 N.C. 575 (N.C. 1896).

118 N.C. 575 (Blake v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Edwards
80 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Greene v. . Stadiem
152 S.E. 398 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Cilley v. . Geitner
110 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)