Blair v. . Insurance Co.

160 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 837, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 137
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 10, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E. 923 (Blair v. . Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. . Insurance Co., 160 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 837, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 137 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Civil actions instituted in the Forsyth County Court to recover on three fire insurance policies, consolidated for the purpose of trial and heard together.

The defenses interposed were that the policies in suit were void, because of the failure on the part of the assured to comply with "the iron safe clause" contained in each policy. *Page 838

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, an appeal was taken to the Superior Court of Forsyth County, where the judgment of the County Court was affirmed, and the plaintiff again appeals, assigning error. Affirmed on authority of Coggins v. Ins. Co., 144 N.C. 7,56 S.E. 506, which is essentially on all-fours with the case at bar.

The cases of Arnold v. Ins. Co., 152 N.C. 232, 67 S.E. 574, andMortt v. Ins. Co., 192 N.C. 8, 133 S.E. 337, cited and relied upon by plaintiff, are readily distinguishable.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mortt v. . Insurance Co.
133 S.E. 337 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Coggins v. . Insurance Co.
56 S.E. 506 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
Arnold v. Indemnity Fire Insurance
67 S.E. 574 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 837, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-insurance-co-nc-1931.