Blackwell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Blackwell v. State

180 So. 338, 28 Ala. App. 179, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 110

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blackwell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ala. App. 398 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 1938·No. 8 Div. 656.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Under the repeated rulings of this court, the question of whether or not the whisky and beer which were found stored in a room of appellant’s residence, under the circumstances that obtained, were in his possession, was properly left to the jury. It, by its verdict, having resolved that question in the affirmative, appellant was guilty, under our decision and opinion in the case of Welder Williams v. State, 179 So. 915. 1 And this regardless of any other questions raised on the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.'

1

Ante, p. 73.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

Under the repeated rulings of this court, the question of whether or not the whisky and beer which were found stored in a room of appellant’s residence, under the circumstances that obtained, were in his possession, was properly left to the jury. It, by its verdict, having resolved that question in the affirmative, appellant was guilty, under our decision and opinion in the case of Welder Williams v. State, 179 So. 915. 1 And this regardless of any other questions raised on the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.'

1

Ante, p. 73.

Blackwell v. State, 180 So. 338, 28 Ala. App. 179, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 110 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

180 So. 338 (Blackwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related