Blackwell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Blackwell v. State

166 So. 442, 27 Ala. App. 94, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 37

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1936

Docket8 Div. 322.

StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 442 (Blackwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blackwell v. State, 166 So. 442, 27 Ala. App. 94, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 37 (Ala. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

We have read the evidence in this case, sitting en banc.

We are impressed that there were errors, prejudicial to appellant, committed on the introduction of testimony. But rather nice questions seem to be involved; and we do not see the need of solving them.

The whole evidence seems to us, and we hold that it was, insufficient upon which to base a judgment of conviction. A discussion would not be helpful.

For the error in overruling appellant’s motion to set aside the verdict of the jury and the judgment renderéd thereon, the said judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI