Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 14, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-01789
StatusUnknown

This text of Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson (Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

Case MDL No. 2738 Document 2157 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -192)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,843 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the Stay is Red. FOR THE PANEL: Dd, BA Chea eumess John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel □ □□□ CERTIFY that the above and joing is & true and correct Copy ‘a RR U : Lee □□□ 2eTnigt ae se SEASE BY catia ie Een □□□□□□□ Den er

Case MDL No. 2738 Document 2157 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 2

IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738

SCHEDULE CTO-—192 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO, CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 19-10821 Maria Morimitsu v. Johnson & Johnson et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 1 19-01789 Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
220 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackmon-v-johnson-johnson-caed-2020.