Blackman v. State

282 So. 2d 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blackman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 1973·No. No. 73-256·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We feel that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F. A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackman v. State, 282 So. 2d 34 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

282 So. 2d 34 (Blackman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.