Blackman v. State
282 So. 2d 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blackman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460 →
Opinion
We feel that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F. A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blackman v. State, 282 So. 2d 34 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
282 So. 2d 34 (Blackman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.