Black v. State

158 S.W. 302, 71 Tex. Crim. 43, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Black v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Tex. Crim. 336
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 1913·No. No. 2559.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

The indictment in this case is drawn in terms frequently approved by this court, and the court did not err in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

There is no statement of facts, nor any bill of exception accompanying the record. There is an affidavit attached to the motion alleging the improper conduct of one juror. The State contests this and files *44 the affidavit oí the juror. The court in overruling the motion for new trial states he heard the evidence. This evidence is not brought forward in the record before us, and we must presume the court acted properly.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. State, 158 S.W. 302, 71 Tex. Crim. 43, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 362 (Tex. 1913).

158 S.W. 302 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.