Black v. State
This text of 158 S.W. 302 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment in this case is drawn in terms frequently approved by this court, and the court did not err in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.
There is no statement of facts, nor any bill of exception accompanying the record. There is an affidavit attached to the motion alleging the improper conduct of one juror. The State contests this and files *44 the affidavit oí the juror. The court in overruling the motion for new trial states he heard the evidence. This evidence is not brought forward in the record before us, and we must presume the court acted properly.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 S.W. 302, 71 Tex. Crim. 43, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.