Black v. State

956 So. 2d 1270, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8328, 2007 WL 1573917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Black v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 920 So. 2d 668
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 2007·No. No. 5D06-1300·Published

Opinion

PLEUS, C.J.

Finding no error, we affirm Black’s conviction for possession of cannabis with intent to sell. However, the State correctly concedes that Black should not have been adjudicated guilty of possession of cannabis over twenty grams because it violates double jeopardy to adjudicate a defendant guilty of both offenses arising from the same criminal episode, even when based upon finding different amounts of cannabis in separate containers. Sims v. State, 793 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction for possession of cannabis over twenty grams and remand for entry of a corrected judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. State, 956 So. 2d 1270, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8328, 2007 WL 1573917 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

956 So. 2d 1270 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. State
793 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)