Black v. State
881 So. 2d 688, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12733, 2004 WL 1918938
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2004·No. No. 1D02-1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant raises several issues on direct appeal. We affirm all issues on appeal without comment except Appellant’s due process challenge to the sexual predator act. This Court has already resolved this issue against Appellant. See Frazier v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 221043 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6, 2004); Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Black v. State, 881 So. 2d 688, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12733, 2004 WL 1918938 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
881 So. 2d 688 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vreuls v. Progressive Employer Services
881 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)