Black v. State
542 So. 2d 452, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2415, 1989 WL 46717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Black v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 545 So. 2d 498 →
Opinion
This cause is before us on appeal of appellants’ convictions and sentences for grand theft. Although we affirm the convictions, we remand as to both appellants for hearings to determine the amount of restitution each must pay. McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Black v. State, 542 So. 2d 452, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2415, 1989 WL 46717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
542 So. 2d 452 (Black v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCaskill v. State
520 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
James v. State
499 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)