Black v. State

542 So. 2d 452, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2415, 1989 WL 46717
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1989
DocketNo. 88-986
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 452 (Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. State, 542 So. 2d 452, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2415, 1989 WL 46717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of appellants’ convictions and sentences for grand theft. Although we affirm the convictions, we remand as to both appellants for hearings to determine the amount of restitution each must pay. McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCaskill v. State
520 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
James v. State
499 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 452, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2415, 1989 WL 46717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.