Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Black v. City of Jacksonville

Black v. City of Jacksonville

37 So. 3d 924, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8205, 2010 WL 2292414
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2010
Docket1D10-1727
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 So. 3d 924 (Black v. City of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. City of Jacksonville, 37 So. 3d 924, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8205, 2010 WL 2292414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Circuit Court for Duval County to enter a final order in his tort action against the City of Jacksonville. However, petitioner has not filed a proper motion for such relief. See Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Once a motion is filed, it must be called up for a hearing. Smartt v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). *925 The petition for writ of mandamus is accordingly denied.

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
37 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 So. 3d 924, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8205, 2010 WL 2292414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-city-of-jacksonville-fladistctapp-2010.