Black v. City of Jacksonville

37 So. 3d 924, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8205, 2010 WL 2292414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2010·No. 1D10-1727·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Circuit Court for Duval County to enter a final order in his tort action against the City of Jacksonville. However, petitioner has not filed a proper motion for such relief. See Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Once a motion is filed, it must be called up for a hearing. Smartt v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). *925 The petition for writ of mandamus is accordingly denied.

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. City of Jacksonville, 37 So. 3d 924, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8205, 2010 WL 2292414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

37 So. 3d 924 (Black v. City of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
37 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)