Black v. City of Jacksonville

986 So. 2d 661, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13424, 2008 WL 2787499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2008·No. 1D05-5078, 1D06-2439·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

986 So.2d 661 (2008)

Timothy BLACK, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 1D05-5078, 1D06-2439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 21, 2008.

Timothy Black, pro se, Appellant.

Richard A. Mullaney, General Counsel, and Virginia Baker Norton, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville; Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Pamela Teixeira Lutton, Special Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, we dismiss these consolidated appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Auto. Fiberglass, Inc., 417 So.2d 272, 273-74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black v. City of Jacksonville, 986 So. 2d 661, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13424, 2008 WL 2787499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

986 So. 2d 661 (Black v. City of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Florida Dcf
986 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)