Black v. City of Jacksonville
This text of 986 So. 2d 661 (Black v. City of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Timothy BLACK, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Timothy Black, pro se, Appellant.
Richard A. Mullaney, General Counsel, and Virginia Baker Norton, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville; Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Pamela Teixeira Lutton, Special Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, we dismiss these consolidated appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Auto. Fiberglass, Inc., 417 So.2d 272, 273-74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
DISMISSED.
WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
986 So. 2d 661, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13424, 2008 WL 2787499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-city-of-jacksonville-fladistctapp-2008.