Bjornberg v. Powell

733 A.2d 84, 169 Vt. 586, 1999 Vt. LEXIS 201
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJune 1, 1999
DocketNo. 99-181
StatusPublished

This text of 733 A.2d 84 (Bjornberg v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bjornberg v. Powell, 733 A.2d 84, 169 Vt. 586, 1999 Vt. LEXIS 201 (Vt. 1999).

Opinions

Because the issues defendant seeks to have reviewed do not make this one of those rare cases in which extraordinary relief is an appropriate means for challenging a pretrial discovery order on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion, defendant’s petition for extraordinary relief is denied. See Chrysler Corp. v. Makovec, 157 Vt. 84, 88-89, 596 A.2d 1284, 1287 (1991); Monti v. State, 151 Vt. 609, 611, 563 A.2d 629, 630 (1989). Further, because defendant has failed to demonstrate that the superior court abused its discretion in denying permission to appeal, defendant’s request for interlocutory appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ley v. Dall
553 A.2d 562 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1988)
Monti v. State
563 A.2d 629 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1989)
Chrysler Corp. v. Makovec
596 A.2d 1284 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1991)
Castle v. SHERBURNE CORPORATION
446 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1982)
In re J.G.
627 A.2d 362 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
733 A.2d 84, 169 Vt. 586, 1999 Vt. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bjornberg-v-powell-vt-1999.