B.J.H. v. State

954 So. 2d 1280, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6767, 2007 WL 1295706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in B.J.H. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14865
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 2007·No. No. 5D04-1976·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PALMER, J.

The Supreme Court quashed our earlier decision reported at B.J.H. v. State, 910 So.2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and remanded the matter to our court for reconsideration under V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla.2006). See B.J.H. v. State, 950 So.2d 399, 32 Fla. L. Weekly S87 (Fla. Feb. 08, 2007). Based upon the Supreme Court’s holding in V.K.E., we conclude that the trial court erred in ordering B.J.H. to pay costs as set forth in sections 938.08 and 938.085 of the Florida Statutes (2004). As such, we strike those portions of the disposition orders that impose costs of $201.00 and $151.00 pursuant to sections 938.08 and 938.085 of the Florida Statutes (2004). In all other respects, the disposition orders are affirmed.

AFFIRMED. COSTS STRICKEN.

ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.J.H. v. State, 954 So. 2d 1280, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6767, 2007 WL 1295706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 1280 (B.J.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B.J.H. v. State
910 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
B.J.H. v. State
950 So. 2d 399 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)