B.J.H. v. State
910 So. 2d 945, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14865
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 2005·No. No. 5D04-1976·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
[946] ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion dated May 31, 2005, and issue this revised opinion in its place.
We affirm this case based upon S.S.M. v. State, 898 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As in V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as being a matter of great public importance:
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY IN DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS TO IMPOSE THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 938.085 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES.
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B.J.H. v. State, 910 So. 2d 945, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
910 So. 2d 945 (B.J.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
B.J.H. v. State
954 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
B.J.H. v. State
950 So. 2d 399 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
RR v. State
920 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)