BJH v. State
This text of 910 So. 2d 945 (BJH v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
B.J.H., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
*946 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PALMER, J.
We grant appellant's motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion dated May 31, 2005, and issue this revised opinion in its place.
We affirm this case based upon S.S.M. v. State, 898 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As in V.K.E. v. State, 902 So.2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as being a matter of great public importance:
WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY IN DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS TO IMPOSE THE MANDATORY SURCHARGES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 938.08 AND 938.085 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES.
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
910 So. 2d 945, 2005 WL 2318975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bjh-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.