Bivens v. Cottle
485 S.E.2d 296
This text of 485 S.E.2d 296 (Bivens v. Cottle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bivens v. Cottle, 485 S.E.2d 296 (N.C. 1997).
Opinion
Jackie L. BIVENS, Mary E. Bivens and Ellis M. Cottle
v.
Deborah Lynn COTTLE (Westlake).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Gailor & Associates, PLLC by Carole S. Gailor, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellees Jackie and Mary Bivens.
Edward P. Hausle, PA by Edward P. Hausle, Greenville; and Lea, Clyburn & Rhine by James W. Lea, III, and J. Albert Clyburn, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
APPEAL DISMISSED; DISCRETIOARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bivens v. Cottle
485 S.E.2d 296 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
485 S.E.2d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bivens-v-cottle-nc-1997.