Bivens v. Cottle

485 S.E.2d 296
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 6, 1997
Docket496PA95
StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.E.2d 296 (Bivens v. Cottle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bivens v. Cottle, 485 S.E.2d 296 (N.C. 1997).

Opinion

485 S.E.2d 296 (1997)

Jackie L. BIVENS, Mary E. Bivens and Ellis M. Cottle
v.
Deborah Lynn COTTLE (Westlake).

No. 496PA95.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 1997.

Gailor & Associates, PLLC by Carole S. Gailor, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellees Jackie and Mary Bivens.

Edward P. Hausle, PA by Edward P. Hausle, Greenville; and Lea, Clyburn & Rhine by James W. Lea, III, and J. Albert Clyburn, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

APPEAL DISMISSED; DISCRETIOARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bivens v. Cottle
485 S.E.2d 296 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 S.E.2d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bivens-v-cottle-nc-1997.