Bitonti
This text of 184 Ct. Cl. 804 (Bitonti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civilian pay; overtime pay; standby time. — Plaintiff, a civilian staff officer employed at Miraloma Air Station in California, sues to recover $32,000 either as overtime compensation for the time spent on telephone standby duty at his home, or as punitive damages for the alleged invasion of his privacy by the United State Government. Defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the grounds that standby time such as involved herein, is not compensable overtime, and that plaintiff’s punitive damages claim sounds in tort and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of this court. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s opposition thereto, and without oral argument, and on the basis of the decision of the Supreme Court in Armour & Co. v. Wantock, [805]*805323 U.S. 126 (1944) and the decision of the Court of Claims in Rapp v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 852, 340 F. 2d 635 (1964), the court concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and on June 7,1968, the petition was dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 Ct. Cl. 804, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 140, 1968 WL 2150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bitonti-cc-1968.