Bisong v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2011·No. 10-1823·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1823

BRIDGET TABI BISONG,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Lyle D. Jentzer, Senior Litigation Counsel, Charles S. Greene, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bridget Tabi Bisong, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We

have reviewed the administrative record and Bisong’s contentions

and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in

denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). We

accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated

by the Board. See In re: Bisong (B.I.A. June 21, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bisong v. Holder, (4th Cir. 2011).

Bisong v. Holder (Bisong v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related