Bisong v. Holder
This text of Bisong v. Holder (Bisong v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1823
BRIDGET TABI BISONG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Lyle D. Jentzer, Senior Litigation Counsel, Charles S. Greene, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bridget Tabi Bisong, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We
have reviewed the administrative record and Bisong’s contentions
and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in
denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). We
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: Bisong (B.I.A. June 21, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bisong v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bisong-v-holder-ca4-2011.