Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Bishop v. Hall

Bishop v. Hall

164 P.3d 344, 214 Or. App. 291
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 25, 2007
DocketCV040617 A127018
StatusPublished

This text of 164 P.3d 344 (Bishop v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Hall, 164 P.3d 344, 214 Or. App. 291 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

164 P.3d 344 (2007)
214 Or. App. 291

Robert Lee BISHOP, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Guy HALL, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Facility, Defendant-Respondent.

CV040617; A127018.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Record and Briefs June 20, 2007.
Decided July 25, 2007.

Patrick M. Ebbett and Chilton, Ebbett & Rohr, LLC, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Buffa v. Belleque, 214 Or.App. 39, 162 P.3d 376 (2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buffa v. Belleque
162 P.3d 376 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Bishop v. Hall
164 P.3d 344 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 P.3d 344, 214 Or. App. 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-hall-orctapp-2007.