Birnbaum v. Birnbaum
103 A.D.2d 1016, 478 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19706
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This case involves allegations of fraud and self-dealing on the part of fiduciary. On an examination of the record we agree with the, Surrogate that there are questions of fact which preclude summary judgment. (Appeal from decree of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S. •— summary judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 103 A.D.2d 1016, 478 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
103 A.D.2d 1016 (Birnbaum v. Birnbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birnbaum v. Central Trust Co.
156 A.D.2d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)