Birnbaum v. Birnbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Birnbaum v. Birnbaum

88 A.D.2d 576, 451 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16733

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Birnbaum v. Birnbaum. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 A.D.2d 710 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1982·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gomez, J.), entered on October 15, 1981, in an action for divorce, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of increasing the temporary maintenance by $100 per week and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We deem the amount awarded inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Fein and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gomez, J.), entered on October 15, 1981, in an action for divorce, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of increasing the temporary maintenance by $100 per week and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We deem the amount awarded inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Fein and Asch, JJ.

Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 88 A.D.2d 576, 451 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

88 A.D.2d 576 (Birnbaum v. Birnbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.