Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Harris
51 So. 607, 165 Ala. 482, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 46
Opinion
— The only error assigned is predicated upon the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the first count. That count is sufficient in its allegation, in general terms, of the negligence to which the injury is ascribed. — Armstrong v. Montgomery R. Co., 123 Ala. 233, 26 South. 349, and authorities therein cited; Sou. Rwy. Co. v. Crowder, 135 Ala. 417, 33 South. 335; K. C. M. & B. R. R. v. Flippo, 138 Ala. 487, 35 South. 457; among many others.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Harris, 51 So. 607, 165 Ala. 482, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 46 (Ala. 1910).
51 So. 607 (Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. Barrett
58 So. 760 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)