Birdie Mae Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County

445 F.2d 318, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9067
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1971
Docket29332, 30768
StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 318 (Birdie Mae Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birdie Mae Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 445 F.2d 318, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9067 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of this court in No. 29332, 430 F.2d 883, 889 as it related to student assignment having been reversed by the Supreme Court, 402 U.S. 33, 91 S.Ct. 1289, 28 L.Ed.2d 577, it is ordered as follows:

(1) The mandate of the Supreme Court (appended hereto) is made the judgment of this court;

(2) The cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The judgment of the District Court in No. 30768 is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings also in conformity with the aforesaid opinion of the Supreme Court.

The District Court shall require the School Board to file semi-annual reports during the school year similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 611, 618-619.

APPENDIX

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 436 —, October Term, 1970

Birdie Mae Davis, et al., Petitioners, v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said United States Court of Appeals in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed with costs at to the parts dealing with student *319 assignment; and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court.

It is further ordered that the said petitioners, Birdie Mae Davis, et al., recover from the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, et al. Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty-one Dollars and Forty-five Cents ($8,651.45) for their costs herein expended.

April 20, 1971

Clerk’s costs $ 150.00

Printing of record 8,501.45

Total $ 8,651.45

A true copy Test:

/&/ E. ROBERT WEAVER

Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Board of School Comm'rs of Mobile Cty.
402 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1971)
United States v. Hinds County School Board
433 F.2d 611 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 F.2d 318, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdie-mae-davis-v-board-of-school-commissioners-of-mobile-county-ca5-1971.