Bink v. Bink
55 A.D.3d 1243, 864 N.Y.S.2d 344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2008·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered May 25, 2006 in a divorce action. The order, insofar as appealed from, determined that defendant’s severance payments are marital property.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 [1244] AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Lunn, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bink v. Bink, 55 A.D.3d 1243, 864 N.Y.S.2d 344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
55 A.D.3d 1243 (Bink v. Bink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HAROLD, MARCELLA v. HAROLD, SYLVESTER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Harold v. Harold
133 A.D.3d 1376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Curley v. Curley
125 A.D.3d 1227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
L.L. v. R.L.
36 Misc. 3d 777 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
Ropiecki v. Ropiecki
94 A.D.3d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)