Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State

DecidedAugust 13, 2018

DocketA18A1920

StatusPublished

This text of Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State (Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 02, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1920. BILLY THARPE PIERCE v. THE STATE.

In 2011, Billy Tharpe Pierce pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault and one count of cruelty to children in the first degree, and the trial court sentenced him to a total of 60 years’ imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. See Pierce v. State, Case No. A12A0269 (affirmed May 11, 2012). Recently, Pierce filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, which the trial court denied on December 13, 2017. Pierce then filed this appeal on February 23, 2018.1 We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, Pierce’s appeal is untimely. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Pierce filed his notice of appeal 72 days after entry of the trial court’s order, it is untimely. Second, “[a]n out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the remedy for a frustrated right of appeal.” Kilgore v. State, 325 Ga. App. 874, 875 (1) (756 SE2d 9) (2014). Because Pierce already has had a direct appeal, he is not entitled to an out- of-time appeal. See Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002) (“[T]here is no right to directly appeal the denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal filed by a criminal defendant whose conviction has been affirmed on direct appeal.”).

1 Pierce directed his appeal to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case here. See Pierce v. State, Case No. S18A1111 (transferred May 7, 2018). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/02/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 02, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1920. BILLY THARPE PIERCE v. THE STATE.

In 2011, Billy Tharpe Pierce pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault and one count of cruelty to children in the first degree, and the trial court sentenced him to a total of 60 years’ imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. See Pierce v. State, Case No. A12A0269 (affirmed May 11, 2012). Recently, Pierce filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, which the trial court denied on December 13, 2017. Pierce then filed this appeal on February 23, 2018.1 We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, Pierce’s appeal is untimely. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Pierce filed his notice of appeal 72 days after entry of the trial court’s order, it is untimely. Second, “[a]n out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the remedy for a frustrated right of appeal.” Kilgore v. State, 325 Ga. App. 874, 875 (1) (756 SE2d 9) (2014). Because Pierce already has had a direct appeal, he is not entitled to an out- of-time appeal. See Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002) (“[T]here is no right to directly appeal the denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal filed by a criminal defendant whose conviction has been affirmed on direct appeal.”).

1 Pierce directed his appeal to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case here. See Pierce v. State, Case No. S18A1111 (transferred May 7, 2018). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/02/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Billy Tharpe Pierce v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-tharpe-pierce-v-state-gactapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack