Bilic v. United Technologies

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bilic v. United Technologies

888 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1951, 1994 WL 705388

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 66206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Anna Bilie, appeals from a decision rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding appellant suffering from a five percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the lumbar spine and a ten percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to depression. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As such, we affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Anna Bilie, appeals from a decision rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding appellant suffering from a five percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the lumbar spine and a ten percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to depression. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As such, we affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bilic v. United Technologies, 888 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1951, 1994 WL 705388 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

888 S.W.2d 764 (Bilic v. United Technologies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.