Bilic v. United Technologies

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bilic v. United Technologies

821 S.W.2d 135, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 1992 WL 4049

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1992·No. No. 60083·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against her former employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against her former employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to 84.16(b).

Bilic v. United Technologies, 821 S.W.2d 135, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 1992 WL 4049 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

821 S.W.2d 135 (Bilic v. United Technologies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.