Bigelow v. Union County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bigelow v. Union County

701 S.W.2d 125, 287 Ark. 486, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2302

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 23, 1985

Docket85-194

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 701 S.W.2d 125 (Bigelow v. Union County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bigelow v. Union County, 701 S.W.2d 125, 287 Ark. 486, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2302 (Ark. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

David Newbern, Justice.

The issue presented here is whether a tort claim against Union County and the Union County Medical Center which is owned and run by the county was erroneously dismissed upon appeal from the county judge to the circuit court. We hold the circuit court properly dismissed the claim, and thus the decision is affirmed.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 12-2901 (Repl. 1979) makes the county immune from tort liability for the acts of its agents and employees. Realizing she could not sue the county initially in the circuit court, the appellant presented her claim to the county judge pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 17-702 (Repl. 1980). The county had not provided a means for settling tort claims against it as is authorized, but not required, by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 12-2902 (Repl. 1979).

Upon denial of her claim by the county judge, the appellant sought a de novo review in the circuit court in accordance with Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2006 (Repl. 1979) which provides that the circuit court “. . . shall proceed to try all such appeals de novo as other cases at law. . . .” In his appellant review, the circuit judge held the provisions of § 12-2901 immunized the county from the appellant’s tort claim. The circuit court thus did, in the de novo review, exactly as it would have had to do if the case had been brought “as other cases at law.” We find no error.

Affirmed.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Newbern, Justice.

The issue presented here is whether a tort claim against Union County and the Union County Medical Center which is owned and run by the county was erroneously dismissed upon appeal from the county judge to the circuit court. We hold the circuit court properly dismissed the claim, and thus the decision is affirmed.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 12-2901 (Repl. 1979) makes the county immune from tort liability for the acts of its agents and employees. Realizing she could not sue the county initially in the circuit court, the appellant presented her claim to the county judge pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 17-702 (Repl. 1980). The county had not provided a means for settling tort claims against it as is authorized, but not required, by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 12-2902 (Repl. 1979).

Upon denial of her claim by the county judge, the appellant sought a de novo review in the circuit court in accordance with Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2006 (Repl. 1979) which provides that the circuit court “. . . shall proceed to try all such appeals de novo as other cases at law. . . .” In his appellant review, the circuit judge held the provisions of § 12-2901 immunized the county from the appellant’s tort claim. The circuit court thus did, in the de novo review, exactly as it would have had to do if the case had been brought “as other cases at law.” We find no error.

Affirmed.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 S.W.2d 125, 287 Ark. 486, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigelow-v-union-county-ark-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack