Big Tree Ass'n v. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Odd Fellows

231 A.D.2d 903, 647 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 27, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 903 (Big Tree Ass'n v. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Odd Fellows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Big Tree Ass'n v. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Odd Fellows, 231 A.D.2d 903, 647 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon granting the reargument motion of respondent Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Odd Fellows (Grand Lodge), Supreme Court properly refused to vacate its order dissolving petitioner, a not-for-profit organization, and directing that its assets be paid to the Avon Lodge, International Order of Odd Fellows, pursuant to Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 1005 (a) (3). Grand Lodge’s contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that petitioner’s motion for summary judgment was premature because issue had not been joined is unpreserved for our review (see, CPLR 4017, 5501 [a] [3]). In any event, issue had been joined because respondent [904]*904New York State Department of Taxation had filed an answer to the dissolution petition. Moreover, after the court granted reargument of the summary judgment motion, Grand Lodge submitted extensive papers in opposition thereto and, indeed, cross-moved for summary judgment. Those papers served the purpose of an answer insofar as they identified Grand Lodge’s position and defenses to the petition (see generally, Miller v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 92 AD2d 723; see also, Kreitman v Einy, 92 AD2d 801, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 730).

Grand Lodge further contends that, upon reargument, it raised a material issue of fact to defeat petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. We disagree. As the court determined, Grand Lodge submitted no proof that petitioner transferred to Grand Lodge an interest in the disputed real property "by act or operation of law, or by a deed or conveyance in writing,” as required by General Obligations Law § 5-703 (1). The fact that members of petitioner, which purchased the property in 1914, became members of the Big Tree Lodge, I.O.O.F., a local lodge of Grand Lodge, and adopted Grand Lodge’s constitution and bylaws in 1958 is irrelevant to the issue whether an interest in the property was transferred pursuant to General Obligations Law § 5-703 (1). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J.—Vacate Order.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Benchmark Management Corp.
294 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Cacciatore v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
234 A.D.2d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D.2d 903, 647 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/big-tree-assn-v-grand-lodge-independent-order-of-odd-fellows-nyappdiv-1996.